They have solid state batteries in motorcycles now.I'm not trying to be jaded but I've been hearing about solid state batteries for over a decade now, and in the real world they've made it as far as phone power banks I think.
Tesla, GM, Kia/Hyundai, plus the Chinese have all shown that you can sell a lot of EVs using exisiting battery tech and some even make money doing it. Plus Rivian's R2 might very well put them into a different sales category as well, again using exisiting battery tech.
But you're right, the battery landscape is changing fast, it'll be really interesting to see what the next few years bring.
Makes sense, if EVs are better, people will buy them. No reason at all for bans, bans just solidify opposition. Keep the .govs finger off the scale and let the market figure it out.
Why just limit this to EVs? Yes, that’s a rhetorical question, too many in government have been bought by the legacy auto makers.
Everyone is different- I know of course that there are those who would compare a bunch of manufacturers for the best value or best car for their needs (even though it might be fugly or unliked by a majority) but no one ever mentions there’s people out there (like meThe EV landscape is moving incredibly fast. By 2028, buyers won’t just be comparing Scout to today’s EVs, they’ll be comparing it to whatever Rivian, Tesla, GM, Ford, Toyota, and others are offering at that time. Longer range, faster charging, lower weight, and improved cold weather performance could become expected rather than premium features.